Tanner Glass — Faceoff Stats
Tanner Glass has a 2014-15 faceoff win percentage of 33.3% across 21 faceoffs in the 2014-15 season. Best zone: Neutral (41.7%).
2014-15 FO%
33.3%
Record
7W - 14L
Total Faceoffs
21
Total Faceoffs
21
Performance by Zone
Offensive Zone
20.0%
1 / 5 faceoffs
Defensive Zone
25.0%
1 / 4 faceoffs
Neutral Zone
41.7%
5 / 12 faceoffs
Situational Splits
Even Str.
8.3%
12 FO
Pen. Kill
66.7%
9 FO
Home
28.6%
14 FO
Away
42.9%
7 FO
P1
22.2%
9 FO
P2
44.4%
9 FO
P3
33.3%
3 FO
Final 5 min
33.3%
3 FO
vs Left
36.4%
11 FO
vs Right
30.0%
10 FO
Season-by-Season
| Season | Team | GP | FO% | W | Total FO | OZ% | DZ% | NZ% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Calgary Flames | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 6 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 2016-17 | New York Rangers | 2 | 100.0% | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| 2015-16 | New York Rangers | 14 | 30.0% | 6 | 20 | 80.0% | 22.2% | 0.0% |
| 2014-15 | New York Rangers | 18 | 33.3% | 7 | 21 | 20.0% | 25.0% | 41.7% |
| 2013-14 | Pittsburgh Penguins | 14 | 47.4% | 9 | 19 | 50.0% | 66.7% | 40.0% |
| 2012-13 | Pittsburgh Penguins | 29 | 43.1% | 22 | 51 | 27.8% | 57.9% | 42.9% |
| 2011-12 | Winnipeg Jets | 41 | 39.7% | 29 | 73 | 10.7% | 58.1% | 57.1% |
| 2010-11 | Vancouver Canucks | 24 | 40.3% | 25 | 62 | 41.7% | 31.3% | 44.1% |
Best Matchups
Not enough data
Toughest Matchups
Not enough data
Similar Players
| Player | Team | FO% | Total FO | Similarity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Connor Brown vs | OTT, TOR, EDM, NJD, WSH | 38.3% | 549 | 95.2% |
| Tyson Jost vs | COL, BUF, NSH, CAR, MIN | 40.1% | 2,342 | 94.1% |
| Andrew Cogliano vs | ANA, COL, EDM, DAL, SJS | 40.8% | 2,103 | 94.0% |
| Jochen Hecht vs | BUF | 43.2% | 1,382 | 92.8% |
| Alexandre Texier vs | CBJ, MTL, STL | 35.0% | 514 | 92.1% |
| Tyler Motte vs | VAN, TBL, DET, OTT, CBJ, CHI, NYR | 42.8% | 502 | 90.5% |
| Kirby Dach vs | CHI, MTL | 36.5% | 1,546 | 90.3% |
| Christian Fischer vs | ARI, DET | 35.4% | 577 | 90.1% |
| David Moss vs | CGY, PHX, ARI | 42.1% | 679 | 90.0% |
| Brett Seney vs | NJD, CHI, TOR | 36.6% | 292 | 89.2% |